Multiple Representations in The Context of Education in The 21st Century
Abstrak
Multiple representation is an important part of practically any human experience. Literature is being extensively used to study how important multiple representations are for pupils’ in understanding a concept. Moreover, we explored whether particular traits in this group were related to participants, the physics concepts, or multiple representation. The eligibility requirements have been encountered in 47 articles studies from Scopus and WoS indexed articles. The review examined the Springer, Sage, Elsevier, Willey, relevant journals using a qualitative research technique. We conducted a search to find papers published from 2019 to 2024. Then, we use descriptive statistics and content analysis to analyse the data. Our qualitative content analysis revealed five key themes: multiple representations, external representations, and multiple representations in physics. The categories and frequencies have each been examined separately. We have been assessed the research's inadequacies in order to direct future efforts toward a deeper comprehension of physics phenomena. In the current reformation of physics education, multiple representation has been highlighted as a new trend in understanding a concept. As a result, the findings of this study may be used as a starting point for all stakeholders involved in physics education in the future, notably educators, professors, and researchers.
Referensi
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Belenky, D. M., & Schalk, L. (2014). The Effects of Idealized and Grounded Materials on Learning, Transfer, and Interest: An Organizing Framework for Categorizing External Knowledge Representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9251-9
Bennett;, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: rigor or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323719
Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 10130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130
Harper, L., Kalfa, N., Beckers, G. M. A., Kaefer, M., Nieuwhof-Leppink, A. J., Fossum, M., Herbst, K. W., & Bagli, D. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on research. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 16(5), 715–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.002
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem-solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17117
Lampinen, A. K., & McClelland, J. L. (2018). Different presentations of a mathematical concept can support learning in complementary ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000235
Mohammadi, V., Rahmani, A. M., Darwesh, A. M., & Sahafi, A. (2019). Trust-based recommendation systems in Internet of Things: a systematic literature review. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0183-8
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). How to Find the Studies: The Literature Search. In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (pp. 79–124). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887.ch4
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Sonn, I. K., Du Plessis, M., Jansen Van Vuuren, C. D., Marais, J., Wagener, E., & Roman, N. V. (2021). Achievements and challenges for higher education during the covid-19 pandemic: A rapid review of media in africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412888
Sormunen, K., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2020). Maker-Centered Project-Based Learning in Inclusive Classes: Supporting Students’ Active Participation with Teacher-Directed Reflective Discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9
Torregrosa, J., Bello-Orgaz, G., Martínez-Cámara, E., Ser, J. Del, & Camacho, D. (2023). A survey on extremism analysis using natural language processing: definitions, literature review, trends, and challenges. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(8), 9869–9905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03658-z
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). Synthesizing Results from Empirical Research on Engineering Design Process in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9129
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-sa4.footer##All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher at the address below.
The ICEETE Conference Series on Economy, Education, Technology, and Environment retains the copyright of all published papers. Any unauthorized reproduction or distribution of the conference papers will be considered a violation of copyright. Permission to use the content of this conference series for any purpose must be obtained from the copyright owner.
